Stefan Fuhrmann wrote on Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:52:37 +0200: > Hyrum K. Wright wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Bert Huijben <b...@qqmail.nl> wrote: >> >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Stefan Fuhrmann [mailto:stefanfuhrm...@alice-dsl.de] >>>> >>>> * r982335 >>>> Limit the amount of unused memory kept in apr_pools >>>> >>> This mail looks like how we handle branches/1.Y.x/STATUS >>> >>> Maybe you should check it in to your branch to allow further updates (and >>> review) there :) >>> >> >> A good strategy. >> >> And thanks for sending this, Stefan, it will help this work get onto >> trunk quicker.
*nod* > Done in r998858. > I was hesitant to do it in the first place because the > review / merge direction is reversed in comparison > to the 1.y.x branches. Indeed, and if we were to prefer the "proposed merges are tracked at the target tree" system then we could keep a STATUS file on trunk that lists the pending merges from all feature branches, instead of keeping that information on each individual branch.
