On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Hyrum K. Wright <hyrum_wri...@mail.utexas.edu> wrote: > As I recall, Stefan recently declared the performance branch "done". > It's encouraging to see a few intrepid users and devs looking at the > branch and providing feedback. > > Through IRC and other conversations, I've gotten the feeling that some > of the changes made on the branch might be a bit too wide-spread to > warrant whole-sale inclusion in 1.7, but several people have expressed > interested in cherry picking at least some bits back to trunk. I've > not yet done a comprehensive review of the changes on the branch, and > would appreciate any suggestions folks may have of low-hanging, > independent useful bits. > > For starters, I would consider: > * the new svn_io_file_read_full2() API > * the new svn_io_file_putc() API > * the new svn_stringbuf_appendbyte() API > > Note that I don't include the caching work, since I think it might be > much more far-reaching, and probably needs more review before going > into trunk. > > The branch should also probably have a catch-up merge to prevent it > from diverging too far. I'm happy to do so, as well as fix up any > style nits which may exist on the branch. I'll do some digging to > determine the various revision ranges to make the above suggestions > merge to trunk, and post back.
Hearing nothing, I'll at least bring the branch up-to-date with trunk, and then go through the logs to find the relevant revisions for the above bits. -Hyrum
