I normally moderate messages through quite actively, but have been remiss this week. IOW, "normally" messages shouldn't ever hang out for very long. I slacked off this week, thinking others would pick up the slack. Guess I was wrong :-P
More moderators never hurts, of course. For those wondering, I think the moderation load is 5-10 messages a day. A simple Reply-All and "send" is all that is required (to moderate through, and to put the person on the "allow" list so future messages do not require moderation). Cheers, -g On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 13:52, Daniel Shahaf <d...@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote: > Daniel Shahaf wrote on Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 20:51:08 +0300: >> @all, do we need more moderators on us...@? > > By the way, exactly the same people moderate dev@ and us...@. (i.e., > users-owner@ and dev-owner@ both go to the same 4 people.) So I imagine > that, inasmuch there is a problem, it would apply to both lists. > > Daniel > (the dev@ moderation queue currently contains only one message, which is > only an hour old) >
