On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 16:17, Branko Čibej <br...@xbc.nu> wrote: > On 30.07.2010 13:57, C. Michael Pilato wrote: >> On 07/30/2010 03:55 AM, Branko Čibej wrote: >> >>> That approach just doesn't sound right to me. I've always understood >>> that a temporary redirect implies that requests should always try the >>> original first. Since there's no concept of a session in HTTP, you can't >>> really assume anything about how long a redirect is valid -- it may be >>> only for one single request and not for others. >>> >> What do you think Subversion should do when it encounters a temporary >> redirect, then? >> > Follow the redirect but not record the new URL in the working copy metadata. +1.
-- Ivan Zhakov VisualSVN Team
