On 28.07.2010 21:55, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Stefan Sperling wrote on Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 16:05:49 +0200: > >> But there's no harm in making svn patch interpret existing move information >> in git diffs. We can carry out a corresponding copy + delete. >> We won't be generating move git diff headers ourselves, but we should >> be interoperable with git diff and hg diff as much as we can. >> > hg diff? I don't recall hearing of 'hg diff' on this list before... are we > trying to be able to parse 'hg diff' output as well? Or how does 'hg diff' > come into the picture? >
IIRC Mercurial uses git-compatible diff format these days. -- Brane
