[ VERY briefly, since it's middle of the night here ] Stefan Sperling wrote on Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 16:33:45 +0200: > In this case though, I'd like to explicitly ask any readers who have silently > been following the thread to voice their opinion, especially if they > differ with my view. Maybe that way we'll find out what the community > at large is thinking about this? And we'll also find out whether anyone else > is actually listening to this conversion :) >
+1 to -1 on --skipfilesmatchingsize. +0 to adding, at the C API level, a "skip" callback function... and even then only if there is sufficient demand for it.
