On 07/26/2010 10:54 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 6:16 AM, Bert Huijben <b...@qqmail.nl> wrote:
>> (A much older suggestion was moving the code into svnsync as they are
>> related tools)
> 
> I think either that or folding it into svnadmin itself.  But, we don't
> need another tool program, IMO.  -- justin

I, too, was thinking about folding it into svnadmin.  But svnadmin has
always been a server-side tool (it knows nothing of URLs and authorization
stuffs and ...) and I kinda think it would be really weird to change that.
There's (in my mind, at least) a much tighter philosophical connection with
svnsync anyway.

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to