> -----Original Message----- > From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name] > Sent: vrijdag 25 juni 2010 10:02 > To: Daniel Näslund > Cc: p...@smedley.id.au; dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: [Patch] - Fix paths on OS/2 - svn-paths.diff [1/1] > > Daniel Näslund wrote on Fri, 25 Jun 2010 at 07:46 -0000: > > On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 02:03:17AM +0000, Paul Smedley wrote: > > > [[[ > > > Fix paths & command prompts for OS/2 by re-using WIN32 #ifdef's > > > > > > * subversion/libsvn_subr/dirent_uri.c > > > * subversion/libsvn_subr/io.c > > > * subversion/libsvn_subr/prompt.c > > > * subversion/libsvn_ra_local/split_url.c > > > * subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/fs_fs.c > > > (various): Use WIN32 code for paths with drive letters and > command > > > prompts > > > ]]] > > > > I (and probably other people too) have a hard time reading your patch > > [1]. :) > > > > Yes. Paul, could you please resend (all three) patches in a format we > can read? That means MIME attachments, or uploading them to a website > or pastebin and providing a link. > > > Why does it look like it's base64 encoded? > > > > base64 only uses the characters [A-Za-z0-9+/]. I forgot or don't know > how the format Paul used *is* called, however.
It was uuencoded (and my mail client just shows the files as attachments). If you really want to, you can probably run 'uudecode mailfile' to extract the attachments. Bert