> -----Original Message-----
> From: style...@apache.org [mailto:style...@apache.org]
> Sent: donderdag 27 mei 2010 11:02
> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: svn propchange: r948615 - svn:log
>
> Author: stylesen
> Revision: 948615
> Modified property: svn:log
>
> Modified: svn:log at Thu May 27 09:02:21 2010
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> (empty)
<irc log>
10:15 <@Bert> stylesen: What did you do to that log message?
10:15 <@Bert> Empty diff? Shouldn't svn ignore such a change?
10:17 <@stylesen> Bert: sorry that was a mistake!
10:18 <@stylesen> the log looks good
10:22 <@stylesen> able to reproduce it, let me see what is wrong
10:44 <@Bert> julianf: ^^^ ;-) First the ^M and now this
10:44 <@julianf> :-)
10:47 <@julianf> (stylesen: Bert, saying "First the ^M ...", is referring to an
incident last night in which it
*appeared* that Subversion had allowed a ^M character into one
of my log messages - which it should
not allow - but in fact I it was just a plain text '^'
followed by a plain text 'M', which I had
inserted in my log message accidentally.)
10:53 <@stylesen> julianf: okie I was talking about the empty log message edits
10:54 <@julianf> Yes, I was just explaining Bert's comment.
10:54 <@julianf> The empty log msg edit is still a puzzle!
10:55 <@stylesen> I do that using svn 1.5.1
10:55 <@stylesen> let me try with trunk
10:57 <@stylesen> no problem with trunk
10:57 <@stylesen> when I do a pedit with trunk svn, there is no empty diff shown
10:57 <@stylesen> for an no-op edit on the property
10:59 <@stylesen> happens only with nano text editor and emacs behaves
properly, something to do with the return value
from nano and emacs
10:59 <@Bert> stylesen: Probably difference between \n at end of file and no \n
11:00 <@Bert> stylesen: But why 1.5.1? ;)
11:00 <@stylesen> Bert: this happens with trunk too
11:00 <@stylesen> when I do a no-op edit with nano editor and any version of
svn, it says "Set new value for property
'svn:log' on revision 948615"
11:01 <@stylesen> but this does not happen with emacs
11:01 <@stylesen> Bert: it is not \n difference
11:02 <@stylesen> vi also behaves in the same way!
11:03 * stylesen okie enough of spamming the commits@ mailing list ;)
Bert
