Should we include any update about the trademark transfers?
Greg Stein wrote: > Hi all, > > Here is the Board report that I filed for this month (as the ASF VP of > Subversion). > > fyi: we're required to keep the Board apprised of all relevant > activities for their review/oversight. this is part of the legal > umbrella the ASF provides for our community. > > If you have any questions/concerns/comments, then please let me know! > > Cheers, > -g > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: <gst...@apache.org> > Date: Mon, May 17, 2010 at 10:35 > Subject: board: r22897 - /foundation/board/board_agenda_2010_05_19.txt > To: board-...@apache.org > > > Author: gstein > Date: Mon May 17 14:35:51 2010 > New Revision: 22897 > > Log: > Add Subversion report. > > Modified: > foundation/board/board_agenda_2010_05_19.txt > > Modified: foundation/board/board_agenda_2010_05_19.txt > ============================================================================== > --- foundation/board/board_agenda_2010_05_19.txt [utf-8] (original) > +++ foundation/board/board_agenda_2010_05_19.txt [utf-8] Mon May 17 > 14:35:51 2010 > @@ -1206,6 +1206,47 @@ Attachment AD: Status report for the Apa > ----------------------------------------- > Attachment AE: Status report for the Apache Subversion Project > > +** Board Issues > + > +The Subversion project has no Board-level issues at this time. > + > +** Community > + > +We have seen some patches and interest from new people on the list, > +and are paying close attention to them, so they will feel welcome and > +hopefully join the community. > + > +** Releases > + > +Since we last reported (March), Subversion made a 1.6.11 release under > +its old header/licensing regime (continuing on the 1.5.x and 1.6.x > +branches; 1.7.0 will be the first ASF release). We are hoping for 1.7 > +to occur late this summer, and the development community continues to > +work on that release. > + > +We are planning to put all prior releases (back to 1.0 and possibly > +earlier) onto archive.apache.org for historical preservation. Some of > +the historical (signed) tarballs include LGPL dependent elements, so > +we will carefully label these (we cannot remove them without > +destroying the original signatures). More recent releases separate the > +dependencies, and we will simply omit those (they are optional). The > +1.7 series will use the standard distribution and mirroring framework > +since they are true ASF releases. > + > +** Other > + > +The issue tracker continues to remain offsite, as nobody is in any > +great rush to tackle that project (nor is there a specific known > +requirement for that to happen; just a desire of the project). > + > +The March Subversion event in NYC went well, producing a suggested > +roadmap that has been well-received and signed-off by the community. > +The Berlin Subversion event is on-track for the 10th through the 13th, > +and an "Apache dinner" will also be held during that time. > + > +We acquired one GSoC student who will improve the diff format > +generation to support additional options. > + > > ----------------------------------------- > Attachment AF: Status report for the Apache Tcl Project -- C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
