Ping. Greg, any additional steps we need to take before uploading the archival tarballs to archive.apache.org ?
-Hyrum On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Hyrum K. Wright < hyrum_wri...@mail.utexas.edu> wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:44, Hyrum K. Wright >> <hyrum_wri...@mail.utexas.edu> wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 8:24 AM, Justin Erenkrantz < >> jus...@erenkrantz.com> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Hyrum K. Wright >> >> <hyrum_wri...@mail.utexas.edu> wrote: >> >> > 1) Is there a guide somewhere about how to use the ASF mirrors and >> >> > release >> >> > infrastructure? >> >> >> >> http://www.apache.org/dev/mirrors.html >> >> >> >> > 2) Is it possible for us to move the existing tarballs to somewhere >> on >> >> > ASF >> >> > infrastructure, so that we can maintain a complete archive of all >> past >> >> > releases (without having to split up said archive)? >> >> >> >> Possible, yes, as there is no legal obstruction in doing so - however, >> >> I'll leave it to Greg to provide a recommendation here. My suggestion >> >> would be to import the old releases into archive.apache.org - but this >> >> is a bit of uncharted territory for the ASF, so there may be some >> >> policy wrangling that is best left to Greg. -- justin >> > >> > Greg, >> > This looks like a good location, do you know what needs to happen so I >> can >> > get the appropriate privs to upload to the subversion/ directory there? >> > >> > Also, I'm planning on just putting the release tarballs, not the deps >> > tarballs. Any reason why we should include the deps tarballs? >> >> Ah. Thanks for the reminder. >> >> Do the deps have code that is less permissive than the Apache license? >> e.g MPL or LGPL (or GPL!) ? >> > > Not sure. In the current set of tarballs, we've got sqlite, serf, apr, > apr-util, neon, zlib, and possibly apr-iconv (in the zips). In the pre-1.4 > days, we actually included the current deps in the shipping Subversion > tarballs, but it might have been just apr, apr-util and neon at that point. > > >> I believe we should have no problem with the svn tarballs themselves, >> and will follow up on legal-discuss with that. >> >> Note that archive.apache.org is not mirrored. The mirroring system >> applies just to current releases. >> > > That's fine. I'm just looking to consolidate our artifacts in one location > as part of the asymptotic move away from tigris. > > -Hyrum >
