On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 00:15, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: >... >>> I want both the base and the working presence, the base presence comes >>> from base_get_info but I couldn't see how to reliably distinguish >>> working presence from base presence when using _read_info. I get >>> SVN_ERR_WC_PATH_NOT_FOUND for no base and no working, and >>> base_shadowed TRUE for base and working, but it was not clear how to >>> distinguish base and no working from no base and working. >> >> Greg? >> >> I think the idea was that you always should be able to tell the difference >> from the status? > > read_info() on its own... no, you cannot always tell. status=normal > could refer to a BASE node, or a WORKING node (and base_shadowed could > be FALSE for these two cases).
This comment is wrong. status=normal means an unmodified BASE node. If there is a WORKING node, then another status will always be returned. I'm about to remove db_working_get_status(), since I'm in that code to fix an incorrect scan_addition call. Cheers, -g
