On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 9:19 AM, <kame...@apache.org> wrote: > Author: kameshj > Date: Mon Apr 12 14:19:23 2010 > New Revision: 933251 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=933251&view=rev > Log: > *STATUS: Propose r933194 for backport. > > Modified: > subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS > > Modified: subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS?rev=933251&r1=933250&r2=933251&view=diff > > ============================================================================== > --- subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS (original) > +++ subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS Mon Apr 12 14:19:23 2010 > @@ -130,6 +130,12 @@ Candidate changes: > Fixes ruby binding tests on a couple of platforms. Needed for > release. > Votes: > > + * r933194 > + Fix for issue 2753 > + SVNListParentPath feature doesn't work when svn authz is used. > + Justification: > + This issue is waiting for resolution for more than 3 years. >
"It's an old issue" doesn't seem like much of a justification to me. Is there a compelling reason to include this fix in 1.6.x? If so, *that* should be the justification for the backport. -Hyrum
