Tim Starling <tstarl...@wikimedia.org> writes: > That was my fourth post to this list, I was referring to the other > three, particularly: > > <http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/subversion-dev/201003.mbox/%3c4baa79df.9040...@wikimedia.org%3e> > > I could see that after being ignored on that issue, my only chance of > being heard would be to get to know the developers and then to take a > more personal approach. That's why I stayed on this list. Unfortunately > I haven't had much time to read it.
You were not exactly ignored, but asking for in-principle approval before submitting a patch is not the way the project usually works, particularly for something that could be a security issue. [...] > could be corrected with a patch to Subversion, possibly as short as a > few lines of code. I'm offerring to write the patch. Writing the patch would be a way forward. -- Philip
