On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 16:45 -0400, Tim Starling wrote: > But like I said, I'm happy with it being configurable. Do you want a > patch for that too? It's a fair bit more complicated than the one I > already did so I didn't want to try it without at least in-principle > approval.
I haven't been active in Subversion development for some time, so you may want to wait for an in-principle approval from someone more likely to be able to conveniently integrate the patch.
