Bert Huijben <b...@qqmail.nl> писал в своём письме Tue, 23 Mar 2010
16:43:30 +0300:
Posted to dev@, in an attempt to get the buildbots green again:
(Yesterday evening; times in CET / UTC+1)
22:20 < CIA-77> rdonch * r926343
/trunk/subversion/bindings/swig/svn_diff.i:
* subversion/bindings/swig/svn_diff.i:
Immutablize some struct members, ...
22:27 <@Bert> RDonch: Does this fix the buildbots?
22:28 < RDonch> Bert: almost.
<snip>
22:31 <@Bert> RDonch: It fails on the x64-ubuntu-gcc bot.. But it looks
like
the centos bot gets further than before
22:31 < RDonch> julianf: in r922239 you add a bunch of const qualifiers
and
say that it's a backwards-compatible change
- but is it? E.g. a function that was a
svn_ra_file_rev_handler_t will no longer be, causing compiler
errors.
22:31 < RDonch> Bert: ^ this is the remaining failure.
I'll add that breaking bindings is a symptom of a larger problem — that
constifying callback definitions breaks API compatibility, code that used
to compile now doesn't. Fixing the bindings is entirely trivial, but I
don't want to do that until I'm assured that the API break is, in fact,
legitimate.
Roman.
