"Bert Huijben" <[email protected]> writes: >> svn_wc_entry_t tmp_entry; >> >> tmp_entry.deleted = TRUE; >> tmp_entry.schedule = svn_wc_schedule_normal; >> >> - return svn_error_return( >> - svn_wc__entry_modify2(db, local_abspath, svn_node_unknown, >> FALSE, >> - &tmp_entry, >> - (SVN_WC__ENTRY_MODIFY_DELETED >> - | SVN_WC__ENTRY_MODIFY_SCHEDULE >> - | SVN_WC__ENTRY_MODIFY_FORCE), >> - pool)); >> + SVN_ERR(svn_wc__entry_modify2(wc_ctx->db, local_abspath, >> + svn_node_unknown, FALSE, &tmp_entry, >> + (SVN_WC__ENTRY_MODIFY_DELETED >> + | SVN_WC__ENTRY_MODIFY_SCHEDULE >> + | SVN_WC__ENTRY_MODIFY_FORCE), >> + scratch_pool)); > > Shouldn't this be svn_node_directory and TRUE for parent_stub > instead of unknown and FALSE? > > Only directories can be in obstructed_delete mode, and in this case > I don't think you can't update the node in the directory itself.
Dunno. I just moved the existing call. I'll investigate. -- Philip
