On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 10:09:57PM +0100, Daniel Näslund wrote: > 1) svn patch should use git diff format > ----------------------------------------
+1 I'd totally mentor this. > 2) Subversion should provide merge tools for dealing with xml or latex > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > XML and LaTeX both is not purely linebased. One item may span multiple > rows and using the usual merge algorithm often (I say often, though I've > never tried to merge xml or latex files) gives us the wrong result. > Since atleast xml-files are very common I'm suspecting there is a use > case for a merge tool. Subversion does not care about content. IMO This project should rather be about making an external merge tool that integrates nicely with svn. > 3) svn patch queues > -------------------- > Ok, maybe it needs a stable WC-NG but we're working hard on that and by > summer there's a good chance we're there. I would really like to have > this one. +1 from me. But I think Greg has ideas about offline commits which would make patch queues superfluous. Also starting this with the current state of WC-NG is probably a waste of time. Stefan
