On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 12:24 AM, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski <blizin...@google.com> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 6:25 PM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> > wrote: >> Committed (with tweaks) in r911893. Thanks > > About the tweaks -- I can see that it's a custom to point at a > specific person maintaining specific set of packages. In my patch, I > pointed at a page specific to the package; this page always lists the > current maintainer. Our packages are built from a common source code > repository, and it's not unheard of maintainers taking over each > other's packages. The package will be always distributed by OpenCSW, > but the specific maintainer may change in the future. > > In this case, I'll add it to the package documentation that when > somebody takes over the package, they need to update subversion's page > as well.
I think it's fine to just say "OpenCSW team" (or whatever moniker you prefer) as the maintainer and provide the general list contact to the OpenCSW team. I don't think it matters who the individual is as long as someone on the OpenCSW team (via whatever preferred mechanisms you have) is able to answer questions if a user has issues with the package. Thanks! -- justin
