Julian Foad wrote on Tue, 9 Feb 2010 at 17:01 -0000: > Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Since the fsfs logics of rev-packing and revprop-packing are entirely > > separate (e.g., min-unpacked-rev and min-unpacked-revprop are separate), > > one could reasonably want to enable one without enabling the other. > > Why? >
Because not everyone who upgrades to 1.7.0 wants to take advantage of all the most recent features right away? (We also provide an 'enable-rep-sharing' config option.) Daniel > As a developer, for testing etc., sure - but in real life? > > - Julian > > >
