Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> писал в своём письме Tue, 26 Jan 2010
01:32:29 +0300:
See below...
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 17:32
Subject: Re: Discussion: graduating Subversion
To: gene...@incubator.apache.org
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 17:21, Craig L Russell <craig.russ...@sun.com>
wrote:
Hi Greg,
On Jan 25, 2010, at 12:49 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
Hi all,
Before calling for a vote to graduate Subversion, I figured it prudent
to have a discussion first. I believe Subversion is quite ready (and
has been, but the holidays and whatnot kept me from sending this
earlier).
Any thoughts on why Subversion should NOT graduate now?
As I've said earlier, I'd like to know how you plan to resolve the
question
of in which package you propose to ship the Java components. IIUC, you
use
org.tigris in the distributions to date.
I don't think we have a specific plan for that yet, and I know we were
looking for "Apache Best Practices" on that, but not sure if we found
any there.
I'll bring that back to the dev list.
What's in a name? Can't we just leave everything as it is until Subversion
2?
Having a package with a misleading name is undesirable, of course, but
it's a nominal annoyance, as opposed to redoing all the old code that
depends on the bindings (and making it backwards-incompatible in the
process).
Roman.
