Kannan wrote: > Julian Foad wrote: > > The notification "Merging ... r891676 through ..." doesn't match the > > actual recorded svn:mergeinfo "r891677-...". > [..] > > Is that difference in the start revision of the range expected? (The > > merge saying it's recording "r891676 through ..." versus diff showing > > that ":r891677-..." was recorded. And a propget confirms the diff.) > > Hi Julian, > > Yes, as stated in [1] start revision of the revision range of a merge is > meant inclusive( from what we get in `svn pget'). > > [1]- http://www.collab.net/community/subversion/articles/merge-info.html
Yes, but the notification message "Merging r891676 through r902803" also sounds like it is inclusive. It's one of those cases where it isn't clear what we mean by a "revision": do we mean a change or a version? When I read it this time I thought it meant the change number 891676 but in fact it means the version number 891676. Never mind, it's not really a problem. - Julian
