Lieven Govaerts wrote: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 11:23 PM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> > wrote: >> Has anyone besides Hyrum, Mark P. and myself taken a look at the new website >> from a layout perspective? What stands between us and the day when we >> remove that yellow banner and "commit to" this thing? > > The general layout looks good and clean to me. One remark: I'm not a > layout/color specialist, but I wonder if the pages won't lack a bit of > color when the bright yellow block is removed.
Yeah, that's fair. I'm primarily interested in content feedback at the moment, but I;ll toss a little color onto the sidebar. > Can we please add the link to the issue tracker again in the menu? I'm > not talking about "report a new bug", but 'look at the existing > already reported bugs and feature requests". Something that makes it > easy for me to type in the word "serf"' and get all the serf related > open reports would serve my needs perfectly. :) It's really all about you, Lieven. :-) But yeah, we need to have a link to a bug tracker landing page on the left-nav, to be sure. I'll add something today. > Some details: > On the getting.html page: DJ has announced he stops building the > windows binaries so he should be removed from the package maintainers > list: > http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2009-11/0872.shtml getting.html is a mess. I'd love to hear Hyrum's thoughts about it, because they will almost certainly be an improvement. > roadmap.html: > The roadmap table is outdated. In fact, do we really plan to keep this > page up to date during the release process? I do believe there's value in revealing where the project is going in a format that's more user-friendly than, say, a pointer to a bunch of issue tracker items. But yes, we need to seriously revamp this page, removing all the vastly speculative material and focusing on what we know. -- C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
