On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 11:14:58PM +0100, Bert Huijben wrote:
> If you want to fix this behavior, you would have to check the exact status
> information to determine that you are exactly in the replacement without
> history case. 
> 
> This is one of the hardest statuses to detect with WC-NG (which was easy as
> entries), but luckily we don't need it any more for the processing in the
> three tree storage model with a SHA-1 based pristine store. There we store a
> hash in BASE and in WORKING.

So... you're saying we should wait with fixing this until the wc-ng
pristine store has been implemented?

Stefan

Reply via email to