Philip Martin wrote: > Kamesh Jayachandran <kam...@collab.net> writes: > >> This patch is with respect to the original thread >> >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/subversion-dev/201001.mbox/browser > > This one I suppose: > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/subversion-dev/201001.mbox/<4b41f1bd.8090...@collab.net> > > It includes: > > "We can proxy this request to the Master but we *should not* do > that if it is for read operation."
With all due respect, the proposed solution looks enormous compared to the size of the problem. Does the original problem exist in HTTPv2? At a minimum, could the ra_dav providers not annotate the PROPFIND as "dont-proxy-this" without even touching the RA (and higher) APIs? -- C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
