Hyrum K. Wright wrote: > On Jan 4, 2010, at 11:18 AM, Bert Huijben wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: hwri...@apache.org [mailto:hwri...@apache.org] > >> Propchange: subversion/branches/1.6.x/ > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> --- svn:mergeinfo (original) > >> +++ svn:mergeinfo Mon Jan 4 16:16:23 2010 > >> @@ -17,6 +17,8 @@ > >> /subversion/branches/1.6.x-r38572:875006-875011 > >> /subversion/branches/1.6.x-r38799:875225-875262 > >> /subversion/branches/1.6.x-r38927:875347-875521 > >> +/subversion/branches/1.6.x-r39019:879132-895676 > >> +/subversion/branches/1.6.x-r39109:879131 > > > > What happens here ^^^^ > > > > I think you triggered an old bug here that should be resolved by a previous > > merge? > > Dunno. I was using the latest 1.6.x client to do this merge, so it shouldn't > be a already-fixed bug.
If it's the "1.6.x-r39109" part that's worrying, that could be genuine mergeinfo. A branch named "1.6.x-r39109" did exist for a while; its name was a typo and so it was deleted and recreated. - Julian
