On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 11:31 -0500, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > "To be a compelling replacement for git/Mercurial", perhaps?
That seems tough. The major architectural differences between git/Mercurial/Bazaar and Subversion are: * No commitment to mixed-revision working copies. * Full history of at least one branch is generally stored on clients. * DVCS workflow support. For small projects and a certain class of developers, these can be huge advantages. For huge projects and a different class of developers, these can be hindrances. (See also http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2008-04/1020.shtml)
