On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Branko Čibej <br...@xbc.nu> wrote: > Philip Martin wrote: >> Paul Burba <ptbu...@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> So shouldn't the mergeinfo on this path in the old repos, >>> >>> >>>> svn pg svn:mergeinfo >>>> https://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/branches/1.6.x-r40452/chan...@40513 >>>> >>> ... >>> /trunk/CHANGES:2-1281,35888-40052,40088,40152,40451-40452 >>> >>> differ from from the new repos, >>> >>> >>>> svn pg svn:mergeinfo >>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/branches/1.6.x-r40452/chan...@880587 >>>> >>> ... >>> subversion/trunk/CHANGES:836421-837700,872307-876471,876507,876571,880525-880526 >>> >>> only by the offset? The fact that it doesn't is troubling, to say the >>> least, and might also explain why you got different results with the >>> old repos. >>> >> >> Yes, I think you are right and I don't understand it. >> > > I find this quite disturbing ... although it has no direct bearing on > whether the merge bug is a new bug or not, we should still figure out > how this mergeinfo got out of sync. > > (BTW, all the above pretty much convinced me that this merge failure > indeed is not a new bug.) > > -- Brane
I agree and will be trying to figure out what happened Monday. Paul
