On Dec 8, 2009, at 1:47 PM, Branko Čibej wrote: > Hyrum K. Wright wrote: >> On Dec 8, 2009, at 1:34 PM, Mark Phippard wrote: >> >> >>> On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 7:39 PM, Hyrum K. Wright >>> <hyrum_wri...@mail.utexas.edu> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Gather up your holiday cheer, for I would like to propose a gift to the >>>> Subversion user community: Subversion >>>> 1.6.7. I know that folks have been busy with the ASF transition as of >>>> late, but our users have been busy >>>> finding bugs and STATUS is getting pretty full. As a result, I'd like to >>>> roll 1.6.7 on Wed., Dec. 16. >>>> >>> Does being in the incubator add any new wrinkles in publishing a >>> release? Such as having it reviewed first? Also, the release >>> obviously does not have any of the license changes in it. Is that a >>> problem? Out of curiosity, once we are a TLP can we still do a new >>> 1.6.x or 1.5.x release without the license changes? >>> >> >> I'm not sure about this. I know Greg and Justin have been traveling, but >> hopefully they can chime in. (I suspect we can still publish the code on >> s.t.o if it isn't yet acceptable to the ASF.) >> > > 1.6.7 doesn't have all the necessary licensing bits. It wouldn't pass a > license review. However, IIRC the IPMC wants to review the release process.
That's what I figured. I'm fine with doing the release process on d...@s.a.o, and allowing whatever scrutiny the IPMC want into the process. -Hyrum
