Bhuvaneswaran A wrote: > Branko, Julian: Thank you for the review comments. > > Incorporated the above suggestion and committed in r887178. Now that the > script is stable, as discussed in this thread [1], shall I nominate this > script to 1.6.x branch? > [1] > http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2410330
Do we need an up-to-date copy of it in branches/1.6.x - in other words, do we want the Hudson system to use the script that it finds in the "dev/tools/" directory of the branch it is building? I would have thought it should just use the copy that's in trunk, even when it is building and testing a branch, because the schedule and purpose of maintaining subversion-1.6.x is separate from the schedule and purpose of maintaining the testing system. - Julian