On Nov 21, 2009, at 3:03 PM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:

> 
> On Nov 21, 2009, at 12:33 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> 
>> I don't recall ANY discussion of rewriting history.
>> 
>> I'm somewhat peeved.
> 
> Sorry 'bout that; I didn't interpret this as rewriting history.  I'm happy to 
> change these edits back if we feel that they aren't appropriate.
> 
> As far as whether or not the old svn:author properties should be updated to 
> reflect changed ASF usernames, I believe they should, for the following 
> reasons:
> 
> * The contribulyzer wrongly interprets the old usernames, since they are no 
> longer in COMMITTERS.  (Arguably, the contribulyzer could be fixed, but it'd 
> be a hack.)
> 
> * We've rewritten the revision numbers as part of the migration to the ASF 
> repos.  Updating past usernames to reflect new accounts logically follows.
> 
> * Usernames are just pointers back to people.  Since psamuelson doesn't exist 
> in the new repository, it's effectively a dangling pointer.  These dangling 
> references should be fixed, as a step toward *maintaining* history, not 
> rewriting it.
> 
> * As Lieven points out in another thread, since we don't have it recorded 
> anywhere, it won't be long before the link of psamuelson<->peters is lost to 
> newcomers to the project.  (Even worse for non-obvious translations like 
> dionisos<->ehu.)
> 
> * In the future, these dangling usernames could be assigned to somebody 
> *else* at the ASF, leading to even more confusion.
> 
> Given the above, I think it reasonable to update the svn:author property on 
> the imported revisions to reflect the new ASF usernames for our committers.
> 
> [ Sidebar: I'm just a little concerned that discussions such as this are 
> happening on d...@s.a.o, when we haven't yet switched off the old list.  I 
> don't want to cross-post, since there may be many people subscribed to both, 
> but I don't know how many.  We've now got two dev lists, and there is likely 
> to be confusion about which one decisions are made on.  Let's turn off 
> d...@s.t.o RSN. ]

I haven't heard any comments on this one way or another.  I'll point d...@s.t.o 
to this thread, but if there is no opposition by Nov. 25, I plan to update the 
remaining changed usersnames.

-Hyrum

Reply via email to