rzo1 commented on PR #46: URL: https://github.com/apache/stormcrawler-site/pull/46#issuecomment-5415077054
Pushed a second commit while this is still open. The robustness statement only mentioned hostile responses, so a worker crash driven by data the crawl stored earlier and replayed did not clearly fall under it. It now covers both paths, uses the word availability once so the position is findable rather than implied, and separates the availability of the crawl from that of the Storm cluster, which is the operator's to protect. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
