Hi, To be honest, it was kind of a coincidence, I showed up there. I started to look a bit deeper into Storm in the last few days, but I still don't know much about it. I started to check the project (clone the repository and tried to build) with some errors, because I use windows and Storm is not so windows friendly. :D Anyway, I did not think I could make a huge impact in it (especially as I am unfortunately not the most active member of the community :( ). But I don't want to let Storm die. If I can help, I want to. In the last few days I read lots about Storm's history and it deserves to live. I am going on a long vacation from 24. May to 8. June, but after that I am happy to discuss how I can help.
Regards, Sigee Richard Zowalla <[email protected]> ezt írta (időpont: 2026. máj. 18., H, 16:35): > > Hi all, > > I wanted to raise something that's been on my mind for a while regarding > the sustainability of Apache Storm itself. From what I've observed, getting > the 3 votes required for releases and decisions has become quite cumbersome > - sometimes really hard - and that makes me worry about how viable Storm is > as a foundation for us going forward. > > On a more positive note, I noticed that Dávid recently showed up in one of > the Storm issues. I think it would be a good idea to try to get a few more > people from the StormCrawler side involved in Storm directly. One thing > that helps here: Storm doesn't differentiate between Committer and PMC - > they vote new people straight into the PMC. So it could be a relatively > clean way to inject some fresh contributors and voting power into the > project. > > If we don't manage to do something along those lines, I'm afraid we'll > have to seriously consider re-inventing or migrating our underlying cluster > technology to another stream processing framework sooner rather than later, > and let Storm die (in the attic). > I'd rather avoid that if we can since the technology has a proven record > in web crawling projects. > > Any thoughts? > > Gruß > Richard
