+1 (Binding)

* Built from source [1]
* Verified Checksums
* Verified Signatures
* No diff b/w git tag & src tar
* Verified Incubating in name
* DISCLAIMER & LICENSE file exits
* Verified the NOTICE file [2]

-Ayush

[1] The README says minimum JAVA requirement as 11, but it doesn't build on
JDK < 17, created:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-stormcrawler/issues/1503

[2] The year in NOTICE file is 2024, should bump it to 2025 in next RC,
created:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-stormcrawler/issues/1502


On Sat, 15 Mar 2025 at 22:50, Markos Volikas <mvoli...@apache.org> wrote:

> Thanks Tim,
>
>   * Checked hashes
>   * Built from source
>   * Generated Solr archetype
>   * Ran a crawl locally with Solr 9.8.0 and Storm 2.8.0
>
> +1 (mvolikas PPMC)
>
> Markos
>
> On 3/13/25 10:04, Richard Zowalla wrote:
> > - Checked hashes and signtures of the src distribution
> > - Checked the staging page.
> > - Checked artifacts in the staging repo
> > - Build from source with full tests
> > - Run a dockerized crawl with the opensearch / playwright module
> >
> >
> > +1 (binding) - rzo1 (PPMC,IPMC)
> >
> > Minor issues:
> >
> > - We need to update the README to reflect that Java 17+ is required to
> build StormCrawler.
> > - Our auto-generated licenses suggest, that we have multiple versions of
> Jackson in the project. This is not a blocking  issue, but we should manage
> that dependency in our root pom to ensure consistency.
> >
> > Thanks for preparing, Tim!
> >
> > Gruß
> > Richard
> >
> > On 2025/03/10 17:25:31 Tim Allison wrote:
> >> Hi folks,
> >>
> >> I have posted a first release candidate for the Apache StormCrawler
> >> (Incubating) 3.3.0 release and it is ready for testing.
> >>
> >> * Upgrade to Storm to 2.8.0 and other dependency upgrades
> >> * Fixed a bug in custom configuration of sitemap processing
> >> * Fixed a bug when multiple processes attempted creation of the same
> >> OpenSearchIndex
> >>
> >> Thank you to everyone who contributed to this release, including all
> >> of our users and the people who submitted bug reports,
> >> contributed code or documentation enhancements.
> >>
> >> The release was made using the Apache StormCrawler (Incubating)
> >> release process, documented here:
> >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-stormcrawler/blob/main/RELEASING.md
> >>
> >> Source:
> >>
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/stormcrawler/stormcrawler-3.3.0-RC1
> >>
> >> Tag:
> >>
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-stormcrawler/releases/tag/stormcrawler-3.3.0
> >>
> >> Commit Hash:
> >> e37e8cbe8388cc041e6fe4349223a0631be7cd4a
> >>
> >> Maven Repo:
> >>
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestormcrawler-1006
> >>
> >> <repositories>
> >> <repository>
> >> <id>stormcrawler-3.3.0-rc1</id>
> >> <name>Testing StormCrawler 3.3.0 release candidate</name>
> >> <url>
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestormcrawler-1006
> >> </url>
> >> </repository>
> >> </repositories>
> >>
> >> Preview of website:
> >>
> >> https://stormcrawler.staged.apache.org/download/index.html
> >>
> >> Release notes:
> >>
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-stormcrawler/releases/tag/stormcrawler-3.3.0
> >>
> >> Reminder: The up-2-date KEYS file for signature verification can be
> >> found here:https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/stormcrawler/KEYS
> >>
> >> Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache StormCrawler
> (Incubator) x.y.z
> >> The vote is open for at least the next 72 hours.
> >>
> >> Only votes from IPMC are binding, but everyone is welcome to check the
> >> release candidate and vote.
> >> The vote passes if at least three binding +1 votes are cast.
> >>
> >> Please VOTE
> >>
> >> [+1] go ship it
> >> [+0] meh, don't care
> >> [-1] stop, there is a ${showstopper}
> >>
> >> Please include your checklist in your vote:
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/Incubator+Release+Checklist
> >>
> >> Note: After this VOTE passes on our dev@ list, the VOTE will be
> >> brought to general@ in order to get the necessary IPMC votes.
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >> Tim
> >>
> >> Here's my +1.
> >> * I verified a clean build with Java 17
> >> * I checked signatures
> >>

Reply via email to