+1 (Binding) * Built from source [1] * Verified Checksums * Verified Signatures * No diff b/w git tag & src tar * Verified Incubating in name * DISCLAIMER & LICENSE file exits * Verified the NOTICE file [2]
-Ayush [1] The README says minimum JAVA requirement as 11, but it doesn't build on JDK < 17, created: https://github.com/apache/incubator-stormcrawler/issues/1503 [2] The year in NOTICE file is 2024, should bump it to 2025 in next RC, created: https://github.com/apache/incubator-stormcrawler/issues/1502 On Sat, 15 Mar 2025 at 22:50, Markos Volikas <mvoli...@apache.org> wrote: > Thanks Tim, > > * Checked hashes > * Built from source > * Generated Solr archetype > * Ran a crawl locally with Solr 9.8.0 and Storm 2.8.0 > > +1 (mvolikas PPMC) > > Markos > > On 3/13/25 10:04, Richard Zowalla wrote: > > - Checked hashes and signtures of the src distribution > > - Checked the staging page. > > - Checked artifacts in the staging repo > > - Build from source with full tests > > - Run a dockerized crawl with the opensearch / playwright module > > > > > > +1 (binding) - rzo1 (PPMC,IPMC) > > > > Minor issues: > > > > - We need to update the README to reflect that Java 17+ is required to > build StormCrawler. > > - Our auto-generated licenses suggest, that we have multiple versions of > Jackson in the project. This is not a blocking issue, but we should manage > that dependency in our root pom to ensure consistency. > > > > Thanks for preparing, Tim! > > > > Gruß > > Richard > > > > On 2025/03/10 17:25:31 Tim Allison wrote: > >> Hi folks, > >> > >> I have posted a first release candidate for the Apache StormCrawler > >> (Incubating) 3.3.0 release and it is ready for testing. > >> > >> * Upgrade to Storm to 2.8.0 and other dependency upgrades > >> * Fixed a bug in custom configuration of sitemap processing > >> * Fixed a bug when multiple processes attempted creation of the same > >> OpenSearchIndex > >> > >> Thank you to everyone who contributed to this release, including all > >> of our users and the people who submitted bug reports, > >> contributed code or documentation enhancements. > >> > >> The release was made using the Apache StormCrawler (Incubating) > >> release process, documented here: > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-stormcrawler/blob/main/RELEASING.md > >> > >> Source: > >> > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/stormcrawler/stormcrawler-3.3.0-RC1 > >> > >> Tag: > >> > >> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-stormcrawler/releases/tag/stormcrawler-3.3.0 > >> > >> Commit Hash: > >> e37e8cbe8388cc041e6fe4349223a0631be7cd4a > >> > >> Maven Repo: > >> > >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestormcrawler-1006 > >> > >> <repositories> > >> <repository> > >> <id>stormcrawler-3.3.0-rc1</id> > >> <name>Testing StormCrawler 3.3.0 release candidate</name> > >> <url> > >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestormcrawler-1006 > >> </url> > >> </repository> > >> </repositories> > >> > >> Preview of website: > >> > >> https://stormcrawler.staged.apache.org/download/index.html > >> > >> Release notes: > >> > >> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-stormcrawler/releases/tag/stormcrawler-3.3.0 > >> > >> Reminder: The up-2-date KEYS file for signature verification can be > >> found here:https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/stormcrawler/KEYS > >> > >> Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache StormCrawler > (Incubator) x.y.z > >> The vote is open for at least the next 72 hours. > >> > >> Only votes from IPMC are binding, but everyone is welcome to check the > >> release candidate and vote. > >> The vote passes if at least three binding +1 votes are cast. > >> > >> Please VOTE > >> > >> [+1] go ship it > >> [+0] meh, don't care > >> [-1] stop, there is a ${showstopper} > >> > >> Please include your checklist in your vote: > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/Incubator+Release+Checklist > >> > >> Note: After this VOTE passes on our dev@ list, the VOTE will be > >> brought to general@ in order to get the necessary IPMC votes. > >> > >> Thanks! > >> > >> Tim > >> > >> Here's my +1. > >> * I verified a clean build with Java 17 > >> * I checked signatures > >>