It seems that I am already subscribed to the mailing list.
I reached out to dev-subscr...@stormcrawler.apache.org and received a
response indicating that my email address is already registered.

This is my first time participating in the Apache mailing list and writing
messages, so I am still very new to this process.
If I am doing something wrong or missing anything important, I would
greatly appreciate it if you could let me know.๐Ÿฅน

2025๋…„ 1์›” 26์ผ (์ผ) ์˜คํ›„ 5:54, Richard Zowalla <r...@apache.org>๋‹˜์ด ์ž‘์„ฑ:

> Hi,
>
> Maybe it would be also good to subscribe to the dev@ list? :)
> Youโ€™re mails are going into moderation and that would be away to
> circumvent that.
>
> GruรŸ
> Richard
>
> > Am 26.01.2025 um 05:52 schrieb ํ™์šฉ์ค€ <kevin09288...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > ๋‹ค์Œ์€ ์ž์—ฐ์Šค๋Ÿฝ๊ฒŒ ๋ฒˆ์—ญํ•œ ์ด๋ฉ”์ผ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค:
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Hi Julien,
> >
> > I apologize for the delayed response.
> > Iโ€™m still getting used to the Apache Mailing list, so I didnโ€™t realize I
> > had received a reply. ๐Ÿ˜…
> >
> > As suggested, I will start by running StormCrawler.
> > Once Iโ€™ve built up some basic knowledge about the project, I will review
> > the discussion you shared and follow up with my thoughts.
> >
> > Thank you!
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Yongjun Hong
> >
> > On 2025/01/22 20:00:51 Julien Nioche wrote:
> >> Hi Yongjun Hong,
> >>
> >> Thanks for your email and your interest in contributing to StormCrawler.
> >> The project is quite mature and there isn't anything that is totally
> >> missing from it but there definitely are improvements to be made.
> >> Contributions take many forms and not just code: a good starting point
> >> would be to run StormCrawler, look at the existing resources and
> >> documentation and see if anything is not clear or missing. Reporting
> bugs
> >> or asking questions is also very valuable.
> >>
> >> One thing I would like to see however is a new spout implementation for
> >> OpenSearch; I had written a description for Elasticsearch a while ago
> >> <https://github.com/apache/incubator-stormcrawler/discussions/990>
> which
> > is
> >> valid for OpenSearch and could improve the performance significantly.
> >> Probably a bit of an advanced topic though, maybe as a start just run
> >> StormCrawler, delve into the details and see what you think?
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >> Julien
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, 21 Jan 2025 at 23:57, ํ™์šฉ์ค€ <de...@gmail.com <http://gmail.com/>>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Dear StormCrawler Team,
> >>>
> >>> My name is Yongjun Hong, and I am a software developer with a strong
> >>> interest in contributing to open-source projects. I have had the
> > privilege
> >>> of contributing to JUnit 5 by implementing performance improvements and
> >>> adding new features, which allowed me to gain a deeper appreciation for
> >>> collaborative development within the open-source community.
> >>>
> >>> Beyond JUnit, I have also made frequent contributions to other
> > Java-based
> >>> open-source libraries, including Spring Boot. My work has focused on
> >>> enhancing core functionality and resolving community-reported issues,
> >>> aiming to improve both usability and reliability.
> >>>
> >>> I am particularly drawn to StormCrawler because of its robust and
> > scalable
> >>> web crawling capabilities, and I am eager to contribute consistentlyโ•
> To
> >>> better understand how I can align my efforts with the projectโ€™s goals,
> I
> >>> would like to inquire about its current status, overall roadmap, and
> any
> >>> key milestones in the near future.
> >>>
> >>> If there are areas where the project could use additional support, or
> if
> >>> there are specific tasks or issues you think I could assist with, I
> > would
> >>> greatly appreciate your guidance.
> >>>
> >>> Thank you for your time and for the incredible work you have done on
> >>> stormcrawler. I am excited about the possibility of contributing and
> > look
> >>> forward to hearing from you.
> >>>
> >>> Here is my Github profile : https://github.com/YongGoose
> >>>
> >>> Best regards
> >>>
> >>> Yongjun Hong
>
>

Reply via email to