All,
  The PPMC vote has passed. I'll start the IPMC vote shortly. Thank you.

+1s

PPMC Julien Nioche (binding)
PPMC Markos Volikas (binding)
PPMC/IPMC Richard Zowalla (binding)
PPMC/IPMC Tim Allison (binding)

Best,

            Tim

P.S. I forgot to include the steps that I took to reach my +1 in my
initial email for this vote:
* built it locally with Java 11 and 21
* checked signatures and hashes

On Sun, Nov 17, 2024 at 3:11 PM Richard Zowalla <r...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> - Checked hashes with 
> https://gist.github.com/rzo1/28d493b24307e253635b0af9e78b0b02
> - Checked signatures with 
> https://gist.github.com/rzo1/28d493b24307e253635b0af9e78b0b02
> - Build from source with tests
> - Run a crawl (opensearch)
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> rzo1 (ppmc + ipmc)
>
> > Am 16.11.2024 um 20:00 schrieb Markos Volikas <mvoli...@apache.org>:
> >
> > Thanks Tim,
> >
> > +1
> >
> > * checked hash
> > * checked content
> > * compiled from source successfully
> > * generated a Solr archetype and ran the topology
> >
> > Markos
> >
> > On 11/16/24 16:44, Julien Nioche wrote:
> >> Thanks Tim,
> >>
> >> +1 (binding)
> >>
> >>    - checked signatures
> >>    - checked content
> >>    - built from source successfully
> >>    - ran a topology with it without problems
> >>
> >> Julien
> >>
> >> On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 at 15:31, Tim Allison<talli...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi folks,
> >>>
> >>> I have posted a 1st release candidate for the Apache StormCrawler
> >>> (Incubating) 3.2.0 release and it is ready for testing.
> >>>
> >>> Highlights in 3.2.0 include:
> >>>
> >>>  * Add support for shards in SolrSpout
> >>>  * Add a websocket option for the Playwright protocol
> >>>  * Drop Java-based topologies
> >>>  * Numerous dependency updates and bug fixes
> >>>
> >>> Thank you to everyone who contributed to this release, including all
> >>> of our users and the people who submitted bug reports,
> >>> contributed code or documentation enhancements.
> >>>
> >>> The release was made using the Apache StormCrawler (Incubating)
> >>> release process, documented here:
> >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-stormcrawler/blob/main/RELEASING.md
> >>>
> >>> Source:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/stormcrawler/stormcrawler-3.2.0-RC1
> >>>
> >>> Tag:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-stormcrawler/releases/tag/stormcrawler-3.2.0-rc1
> >>>
> >>> Commit Hash:
> >>>
> >>> c3155c9a4c60c59e37a88ca5f48a0999a24db96c
> >>>
> >>> Maven Repo:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestormcrawler-1003
> >>>
> >>> <repositories>
> >>> <repository>
> >>> <id>stormcrawler-3.2.0-rc1</id>
> >>> <name>Testing StormCrawler x.y.z release candidate</name>
> >>> <url>
> >>>
> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestormcrawler-1003
> >>> </url>
> >>> </repository>
> >>> </repositories>
> >>>
> >>> Preview of website:
> >>>
> >>> https://stormcrawler.staged.apache.org/download/index.html
> >>>
> >>> Release notes:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-stormcrawler/releases/tag/stormcrawler-3.2.0-rc1
> >>>
> >>> Reminder: The up-2-date KEYS file for signature verification can be
> >>> found here:https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/stormcrawler/KEYS
> >>>
> >>> Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache StormCrawler (Incubator)
> >>> 3.2.0
> >>> The vote is open for at least the next 72 hours.
> >>>
> >>> Only votes from IPMC are binding, but everyone is welcome to check the
> >>> release candidate and vote.
> >>> The vote passes if at least three binding +1 votes are cast.
> >>>
> >>> Please VOTE
> >>>
> >>> [+1] go ship it
> >>> [+0] meh, don't care
> >>> [-1] stop, there is a ${showstopper}
> >>>
> >>> Please include your checklist in your vote:
> >>>
> >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/Incubator+Release+Checklist
> >>>
> >>> Note: After this VOTE passes on our dev@ list, the VOTE will be
> >>> brought to general@ in order to get the necessary IPMC votes.
> >>>
> >>> Here's my +1
> >>>
> >>> Thanks!
> >>>
> >>> Tim Allison
>

Reply via email to