> On Oct. 24, 2016, 4:14 p.m., Attila Szabo wrote:
> > src/java/com/cloudera/sqoop/SqoopOptions.java, lines 46-59
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/53134/diff/2/?file=1544216#file1544216line46>
> >
> >     Hi,
> >     
> >     This "arg" property does not look very helpful/expressive here.
> >     
> >     Could you please rename it like "formatName" or something similar?

Final solution does not contain it.


> On Oct. 24, 2016, 4:14 p.m., Attila Szabo wrote:
> > src/java/com/cloudera/sqoop/SqoopOptions.java, lines 46-49
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/53134/diff/2/?file=1544216#file1544216line46>
> >
> >     I'm a bit concerned here. Do we really want to notify the user with the 
> > name of the argument instead with the name of the format?
> >     
> >     Could you please highlight me the pros?

Thanks for the feedback, it was a valid point to think about, I have reverted 
this change.


> On Oct. 24, 2016, 4:14 p.m., Attila Szabo wrote:
> > src/test/org/apache/sqoop/tool/ImportToolValidateOptionsTest.java, lines 
> > 91-144
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/53134/diff/2/?file=1544218#file1544218line91>
> >
> >     Could you please squash these for test cases into "one" and instead use 
> > the DDT capabilities of JUnit to solve the parametrization on that level?

Thanks for the idea, I have made a parametrized test case for the failing cases.


- Boglarka


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/53134/#review153699
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Nov. 6, 2016, 6:01 p.m., Boglarka Egyed wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/53134/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 6, 2016, 6:01 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Sqoop.
> 
> 
> Bugs: SQOOP-3034
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-3034
> 
> 
> Repository: sqoop-trunk
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> HBase import should fail fast if using anything other than as-textfile as 
> those are ignored in the current implementation, however, the user is not 
> informed about it and the HBase import performs silently as a textfile.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/java/org/apache/sqoop/tool/BaseSqoopTool.java 
> 13a9697b2d94e3846f86e1b605cfff3d01dd9347 
>   src/test/org/apache/sqoop/tool/ImportToolValidateOptionsTest.java 
> 503a86340f5ae33c8eb0a27b8450b2af0a342db9 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/53134/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Test cases have been added for option validation check.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Boglarka Egyed
> 
>

Reply via email to