Hey Venkat,

I had a look into that issue - it seems the problem is even though you request 
4 mappers - Sqoop runs 5 mappers. Is the number of mappers meant to be 
guaranteed? For example if I say 4 mappers, should I get 4 mappers? I guess 
there could be potential to get less mappers if the data was for example 1 row 
- then that would only be processed by 1 mapper. But should it be possible to 
get more mappers than requested?

OraOop is assuming there will be no more mappers than requested - so if this is 
a valid scenario we would need to modify OraOop. On the other hand if this is 
unexpected behaviour then we should look at why the num mappers is not working?

Either way I don't think we need to fix it for this release - as it seems 
customers would be unlikely to hit this issue.

David

-----Original Message-----
From: Venkat Ranganathan [mailto:vranganat...@hortonworks.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, 23 July 2014 1:04 PM
To: dev@sqoop.apache.org
Subject: Re: Final Jiras and Release Date

Abe

Do we want to target SQOOP-1388 also for 1.4.5 - the one that Vidya has raised 
for one of the Oracle connector export failure?

My avro patch is in RB.

Thanks

Venkat

On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Abraham Elmahrek <a...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> It looks like we still have a couple of Jiras still open. Let's see 
> how things look tomorrow, but let's have these be the last two Jiras 
> slotted for this release.
>
> -Abe
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Venkat Ranganathan < 
> vranganat...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>
>> Sounds good.   I have already uploaded the patch for SQOOP-1358.   It
>> needs to be reviewed by a committer and then committed if no further 
>> changes are needed (or more work needed otherwise).
>>
>> Thanks for driving the release!
>>
>> Venkat
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho 
>> <jar...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> > Seems reasonable to me, thank you for driving the release Abe!
>> >
>> > Jarcec
>> >
>> > On Jul 18, 2014, at 10:40 AM, Abraham Elmahrek <a...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hey guys,
>> >>
>> >> I haven't seen a -1 on this suggestion. So let's create a release 
>> >> branch come Wednesday July 23rd.
>> >>
>> >> -Abe
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Abraham Elmahrek 
>> >> <a...@cloudera.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Are there any objections to this branch date?
>> >>>
>> >>> -Abe
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Abraham Elmahrek 
>> >>> <a...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> Hey guys,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> It looks like there are a couple of Jiras that are in progress 
>> >>>> and slotted for the 1.4.5 release. If we aim for July 23rd to 
>> >>>> create a
>> release
>> >>>> branch, does that give every one enough time to finish up what 
>> >>>> they're working on?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-1353 for more 
>> >>>> information.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> -Abe
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >
>>
>> --
>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
>> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or 
>> entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is 
>> confidential, privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable 
>> law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you 
>> are hereby notified that any printing, copying, dissemination, 
>> distribution, disclosure or forwarding of this communication is 
>> strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in 
>> error, please contact the sender immediately and delete it from your system. 
>> Thank You.
>>

--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to 
which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, 
privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of 
this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or forwarding of 
this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete it 
from your system. Thank You.

Reply via email to