Yea, I wasn't able to comment on the doc - so I just posted the question
here.

Thanks,
Anish

On Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 4:37 PM Hyukjin Kwon <[email protected]> wrote:

> I actually intentionally disabled the commenter access so the discussion
> can happen here :-). Otherwise, we would end up with multiple places to
> discuss this.
>
> On Tue, 9 Dec 2025 at 09:33, L. C. Hsieh <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Can you open comment access to the google doc?
>> So it will be easier to ask questions directly on the SPIP doc.
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 7, 2025 at 1:53 PM Hyukjin Kwon <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > I would like to start a discussion on accelerating the Apache Spark
>> release cadence. Over the past four months, we have been running preview
>> releases, and the process has been smooth and effective. As mentioned in
>> the preview release discussion thread, I’d now like to extend this approach
>> to official releases.
>> >
>> > During this period, I also looked into how other large projects, such
>> as Kubernetes and Python, manage their release timelines. Based on that
>> research and our own recent experience, I’ve drafted a proposal for an
>> updated Apache Spark release plan.
>> >
>> > TL;DR:
>> >
>> > Introduce a predictable release schedule: annual major releases and
>> quarterly minor releases, so users can benefit from new features earlier.
>> > With a faster cadence for minor releases, we should take a more
>> conservative approach toward behavior changes in minor versions, while
>> still allowing new features and improvements.
>> >
>> > I’d love to hear your thoughts and feedback.
>> >
>> > More details can be found in SPIP: Accelerating Apache Spark Release
>> Cadence
>> >
>> > Thanks!
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe e-mail: [email protected]
>>
>>

Reply via email to