Thanks DB, I just noticed a few more comments came in after I initiated the vote. I'm going to postpone the voting process and address those outstanding comments.
Qi Tan DB Tsai <dbt...@dbtsai.com> 于2025年3月27日周四 15:12写道： > Hello Qi, > > I'm supportive of the NanoSecond Timestamps proposal; however, before we > initiate the vote, there are a few outstanding comments in the SPIP > document that haven't been addressed yet. Since the vote is on the document > itself, could we resolve these items beforehand? > > For example: > > - > > The default precision of TimestampNsNTZType is set to 6, which > overlaps with the existing TimestampNTZ. > - > > The specified range exceeds the capacity of an int64, but the document > doesn't clarify how this type will be represented in memory or serialized > in data sources. > - > > Schema inference details for data sources are missing. > > These points still need discussion. > > I appreciate your efforts in putting the doc together and look forward to > your contribution! > > Thanks, > DB Tsai | https://www.dbtsai.com/ | PGP 42E5B25A8F7A82C1 > > On Mar 27, 2025, at 1:24 PM, huaxin gao <huaxin.ga...@gmail.com> wrote: > > +1 > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 1:22 PM Qi Tan <qi.tan.j...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I would like to start a vote on adding support for nanoseconds >> timestamps. >> >> *Discussion thread: * >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/y2vzrjl1499j5dvbpg3m81jxdhf4b6of >> *SPIP:* >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wjFsBdlV2YK75x7UOk2HhDOqWVA0yC7iEiqOMnNnxlA/edit?usp=sharing >> *JIRA:* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-50532 >> >> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours: >> >> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP >> [ ] +0 >> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because >> > >
