>From my understanding, yes. On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 4:03 PM Wenchen Fan <cloud0...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Do I understand correctly that now we can merge > https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/49984 and unblock Spark 4.0? > > To make sure that everyone is on the same page as not all the people have > read all the discussion threads: > 1. This PR *DOES* *NOT* add back the misnamed configuration. People > cannot set that configuration anymore with Spark 4.0. > 2. This PR adds a migration path in case the misnamed configuration is > persistent in the streaming checkpoint. This is necessary otherwise the > streaming query needs to re-process all the inputs, or users need to > modify the streaming checkpoint files manually. > > On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 1:45 PM Mark Hamstra <markhams...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> As you noted previously, this does allow the original vote to proceed >> without a valid veto, but I will also note that this does not preclude >> modifying the migration logic later to avoid explicitly including >> “databricks” in the code if people think that is important and an >> agreeable, technically sound alternative is proposed. >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 3:37 PM Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >>> The vote passes with 5 +1s (4 binding +1s) and 3 -1s (3 binding -1s). >>> >>> (* = binding) >>> +1: >>> - Mark Hamstra * >>> - Jungtaek Lim >>> - Wenchen Fan * >>> - Reynold Xin * >>> - Yuanjian Li * >>> >>> -1: >>> - Holden Karau * >>> - Hyukjin Kwon * >>> - Dongjoon Hyun * >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>>
