This vote has not passed.

The proposed code change has been vetoed by a qualified voter. The
validity of that veto has been called into question since "the voter
must provide with the veto a technical justification showing why the
change is bad (opens a security exposure, negatively affects
performance, etc. )." It has been less than 24 hours since Dongjoon's
veto was called into question. He should be given a chance to explain
why there is technical justification for it.

On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 7:21 PM Jungtaek Lim
<kabhwan.opensou...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The vote passes with 7 +1s (3 binding +1s) and 1 -1s (1 binding -1s).
> Thanks to all who helped with the vote!
>
> I'm going to make a code change in branch-4.0 quickly so that we don't have 
> to trigger another RC for Spark 4.0.0 just because of this.
>
> (* = binding)
> +1:
> - Sean R. Owen *
> - Jungtaek Lim
> - Nicholas Chammas
> - Wenchen Fan *
> - Adam Binford
> - Russell Jurney
> - Yang Jie *
>
> -1:
> - Dongjoon Hyun *
>
> Thanks,
> Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to