I don't see its relevance to ASF board report? It is a minor technicality
and probably tangential. It is not a show stopper and the Board does it
need to worry about it.

Best to take this discussion on its own thread

Dr Mich Talebzadeh,
Architect | Data Science | Financial Crime | Forensic Analysis | GDPR

   view my Linkedin profile
<https://www.linkedin.com/in/mich-talebzadeh-ph-d-5205b2/>





On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 at 08:05, Ángel <angel.alvarez.pas...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Btw, while analyzing this issue, I've also noticed that exactly the same
> plan got stringified several times. Not only that, but even within a plan,
> the same nodes got stringified dozens and dozens of times. I haven't
> reported it because I added the memoization pattern to fix both things and,
> despite fixing it ... the root issue with performance and OOM still
> persisted.
>
> PS: Some nodes got stringified thousands of times. I was ... totally in
> shock nobody had noticed it before.
>
> El jue, 6 feb 2025 a las 8:55, Ángel (<angel.alvarez.pas...@gmail.com>)
> escribió:
>
>> If I'm not wrong, the events were still been generated and stored and
>> contained the plans (but without the description). Maybe we could just
>> simply... generate the strings "on demand" in a lazy fashion, when the user
>> requests it on Spark UI.
>>
>> I don't know if that's even possible, just thought about it while walking
>> my dog ...🐶
>>
>> El jue, 6 feb 2025, 8:41, Wenchen Fan <cloud0...@gmail.com> escribió:
>>
>>> Hi Angel,
>>>
>>> AFAIK many people rely on the Spark UI to debug/inspect their queries
>>> with the query pan tree and metrics, but you are right that plan string
>>> generation is expensive, and we shouldn't do it for every AQE plan change.
>>> Maybe we should do it only once to report the final plan for AQE? Let's
>>> continue the discussion on the PR.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 1:48 PM Ángel <angel.alvarez.pas...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'd like to add that Spark is not as fast as it should be, primarily
>>>> due to its internal verbosity, as reported in ticket *SPARK-50992
>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-50992>*. After submitting
>>>> this  PR <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/49724>, I received some
>>>> comments, which I quickly addressed, but the PR has since stalled.
>>>>
>>>> I strongly believe that Spark should prioritize performance over
>>>> internal logging, especially when it has such a significant impact on
>>>> execution speed and can lead to memory issues.
>>>>
>>>> In *GraphFrames*, the temporary workaround was to disable *AQE
>>>> (Adaptive Query Execution)*. Just last week, I gave the same advice to
>>>> a colleague experiencing performance issues with a *Databricks*
>>>> notebook—and it worked. Disabling *AQE* to improve performance because
>>>> Spark continuously generates string descriptions of physical plans
>>>> internally -  that very likely noone is going to make use of them - makes
>>>> little sense to me.
>>>> PS: I wish I was wrong, but I really think I am not.
>>>> PS2: The first part of a series of articles I'm wrting about this
>>>> issue: link
>>>> <https://medium.com/@angel.alvarez.pascua/apache-spark-wtf-i-like-it-when-a-plan-comes-together-part-i-48c52a667288>
>>>>
>>>> El jue, 6 feb 2025 a las 6:30, Adam Hobbs
>>>> (<adam.ho...@bendigoadelaide.com.au.invalid>) escribió:
>>>>
>>>>> I'd like to add something around the failure to get any traction on
>>>>> shepparding of the structured streaming DRA PR.  Multiple times now there
>>>>> have been calls for help to get this initiative over the line and the
>>>>> response has been disappointing.  The github PR has been closed due to
>>>>> inaction (https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/42352).
>>>>>
>>>>> This seems like a bit of a failure in the process
>>>>> .
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Adam Hobbs
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> C2 - Internal Use
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Matei Zaharia <matei.zaha...@gmail.com>
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, 6 February 2025 2:57 PM
>>>>> To: Spark dev list <dev@spark.apache.org>
>>>>> Cc: priv...@spark.apache.org
>>>>> Subject: ASF board report draft for February 2025
>>>>>
>>>>> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organisation. Do
>>>>> not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender's full
>>>>> email address and know the content is safe.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> It’s time to send our next ASF board report again on February 12th.
>>>>> Here’s an initial draft — feel free to suggest changes:
>>>>>
>>>>> =====================
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Description:
>>>>>
>>>>> Apache Spark is a fast and general purpose engine for large-scale data
>>>>> processing. It offers high-level APIs in Java, Scala, Python, R and SQL as
>>>>> well as a rich set of libraries including stream processing, machine
>>>>> learning, and graph analytics.
>>>>>
>>>>> Issues for the board:
>>>>>
>>>>> - None
>>>>>
>>>>> Project status:
>>>>>
>>>>> - The Spark 4.0 branch has been cut and has entered the QA stage. We
>>>>> encourage the community to test it out!
>>>>> - We released Spark 3.5.4 on December 20th, 2024.
>>>>> - The PMC voted to add one new committer (Bingkun Pan) and one new PMC
>>>>> member (Jie Yang) to the project.
>>>>> - The proposal to "Use plain text logs by default" was successfully
>>>>> passed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Trademarks:
>>>>>
>>>>> - No changes since last report.
>>>>>
>>>>> Latest releases:
>>>>>
>>>>> - Spark 3.5.4 was released on Dec 20, 2024
>>>>> - Spark 3.4.4 was released on Oct 27, 2024
>>>>> - Spark 4.0 Preview 2 was released on Sept 26, 2024
>>>>>
>>>>> Committers and PMC:
>>>>>
>>>>> - The latest committer was added on Nov 13, 2024 (Bingkun Pan).
>>>>> - The latest PMC member was added on Jan 21st, 2025 (Jie Yang).
>>>>>
>>>>> =====================
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ********************************************************************************
>>>>>
>>>>> This communication is intended only for use of the addressee and may
>>>>> contain legally privileged and confidential information.
>>>>> If you are not the addressee or intended recipient, you are notified
>>>>> that any dissemination, copying or use of any of the information is
>>>>> unauthorised.
>>>>>
>>>>> The legal privilege and confidentiality attached to this e-mail is not
>>>>> waived, lost or destroyed by reason of a mistaken delivery to you.
>>>>> If you have received this message in error, we would appreciate an
>>>>> immediate notification via e-mail to contac...@bendigoadelaide.com.au
>>>>> or by phoning 1300 BENDIGO (1300 236 344), and ask that the e-mail be
>>>>> permanently deleted from your system.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bendigo and Adelaide Bank Limited ABN 11 068 049 178
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ********************************************************************************
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>

Reply via email to