I think people are still reading "deprecated" as "removed". It 100% does not mean that. Wouldn't it be more likely that 'old' things are deprecated than new? What is light about this 100+ message discussion? I myself did not see any strong arguments against deprecation, which seemed to amount to "maybe someone is interested in it that hasn't been for the last few years", so it seemed clear this was the right step. What impact analysis have you seen conducted that would have addressed these?
Just trying to understand the objection or thinking here On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 8:48 PM Ángel <angel.alvarez.pas...@gmail.com> wrote: > I thought that too ... until I read the message from Matei Zaharia: > > "Votes to deprecate both SparkR and GraphX have passed. These components > will officially be deprecated in Spark 4." > > Didn't know in open source you could deprecate things that have been there > years so lightly without carrying out any impact analysis and in the middle > of an active (and interesting, btw) discussion. > >>
