+1 On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 at 07:14, Ángel <angel.alvarez.pas...@gmail.com> wrote:
> -1 Don’t deprecate GraphX because may be useful for some people and ... > would there be any replacement for that API? Anyway, I don't think > deprecating an API only because it hasn't been updated in ages is a good > practice (but I could be perfectly wrong). > > El jue, 3 oct 2024, 16:31, Wenchen Fan <cloud0...@gmail.com> escribió: > >> +1 >> >> On Tue, Oct 1, 2024 at 4:20 PM beliefer <belie...@163.com> wrote: >> >>> +1. >>> >>> I didn't hear users need it. >>> >>> >>> At 2024-10-01 02:01:17, "Holden Karau" <holden.ka...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> I think it has been de-facto deprecated, we haven’t updated it >>> meaningfully in several years. I think removing the API would be excessive >>> but deprecating it would give us the flexibility to remove it in the not >>> too distant future. >>> >>> That being said this is not a vote to remove GraphX, I think that >>> whenever that time comes (if it does) we should have a separate vote >>> >>> This VOTE will be open for a little more than one week, ending on >>> October 8th*. To vote reply with: >>> +1 Deprecate GraphX >>> 0 I’m indifferent >>> -1 Don’t deprecate GraphX because ABC >>> >>> If you have a binding vote to simplify you tallying at the end please >>> mark your vote with a *. >>> >>> (*mostly because I’m going camping for my birthday) >>> >>> Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau >>> Fight Health Insurance: https://www.fighthealthinsurance.com/ >>> <https://www.fighthealthinsurance.com/?q=hk_email> >>> Books (Learning Spark, High Performance Spark, etc.): >>> https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9 <https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9> >>> YouTube Live Streams: https://www.youtube.com/user/holdenkarau >>> Pronouns: she/her >>> >>>
