+1 (non-binding) On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 16:43 Reynold Xin <r...@databricks.com.invalid> wrote:
> +1 > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 10:28 AM Mich Talebzadeh < > mich.talebza...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 for me >> >> Mich Talebzadeh, >> >> Architect | Data Engineer | Data Science | Financial Crime >> PhD <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctor_of_Philosophy> Imperial >> College London <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperial_College_London> >> London, United Kingdom >> >> >> view my Linkedin profile >> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/mich-talebzadeh-ph-d-5205b2/> >> >> >> https://en.everybodywiki.com/Mich_Talebzadeh >> >> >> >> *Disclaimer:* The information provided is correct to the best of my >> knowledge but of course cannot be guaranteed . It is essential to note >> that, as with any advice, quote "one test result is worth one-thousand >> expert opinions (Werner >> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wernher_von_Braun>Von Braun >> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wernher_von_Braun>)". >> >> >> On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 at 09:16, Martin Grund <mar...@databricks.com.invalid> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Folks, >>> >>> following the discussion in the previous thread, I would like to open >>> the vote on the following proposal: >>> >>> Enabling the use of GitHub Issues for issue tracking for the Spark >>> Connect Go repository. This will support the tracking of issues that are >>> exclusively relevant to this project. For all issues that are cross-cutting >>> with PySpark / Spark Core, regular Jira will be used. After 3-6 months, I >>> will report back to the community about how the experience was and the >>> lessons learned. >>> >>> I will start the vote with my +1. >>> >>> Martin >>> >>
