Hi Martin,

Sound like a plan

let us go for it.

P.S. I would also like to take this opportunity to congratulate you on your
election as a committer for the Apache Spark project (as per Matei's
email). Your contributions to the project have been invaluable and this
recognition is a testament to your dedication.


Mich Talebzadeh,

Architect | Data Engineer | Data Science | Financial Crime
PhD <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctor_of_Philosophy> Imperial College
London <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperial_College_London>
London, United Kingdom


   view my Linkedin profile
<https://www.linkedin.com/in/mich-talebzadeh-ph-d-5205b2/>


 https://en.everybodywiki.com/Mich_Talebzadeh



*Disclaimer:* The information provided is correct to the best of my
knowledge but of course cannot be guaranteed . It is essential to note
that, as with any advice, quote "one test result is worth one-thousand
expert opinions (Werner  <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wernher_von_Braun>Von
Braun <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wernher_von_Braun>)".


On Sun, 11 Aug 2024 at 18:55, Martin Grund <mar...@databricks.com.invalid>
wrote:

> Given the feedback, I would propose to use the Spark Connect Go client as
> a test project for this and will provide feedback in due time on the
> possibilities and management options. When we have a consensus, I would
> prepare a PR and make this clear in the contribution guidelines for the
> repository and set up the basic GH Issues Infrastructure.
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 10, 2024 at 6:30 AM yangjie01 <yangji...@baidu.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>>
>>
>> *发件人**: *Jungtaek Lim <kabhwan.opensou...@gmail.com>
>> *日期**: *2024年8月10日 星期六 07:12
>> *收件人**: *Denny Lee <denny.g....@gmail.com>
>> *抄送**: *bo yang <bobyan...@gmail.com>, Kent Yao <y...@apache.org>, "
>> dev@spark.apache.org" <dev@spark.apache.org>
>> *主题**: *[外部邮件] Re: [DISCUSS] Using Github Issues for Spark-Connect-Go
>> _only_ issues.
>>
>>
>>
>> +1, good size project for experiments and it’s not a one way door
>>
>>
>>
>> 2024년 8월 10일 (토) 오전 1:09, Denny Lee <denny.g....@gmail.com>님이 작성:
>>
>> +1 (non-binding) to start as a small experiment
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 9, 2024 at 11:56 PM bo yang <bobyan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> +1 to start small as an experiment to see how people use GitHub issue...
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 8, 2024 at 11:54 PM Kent Yao <y...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> On 2024/08/08 23:24:32 Hyukjin Kwon wrote:
>> > SGTM
>> >
>> > On Thu, 8 Aug 2024 at 14:53, Martin Grund <mar...@databricks.com.invalid
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi folks,
>> > >
>> > > I wanted to start a discussion for the following proposal: To make it
>> > > easier for folks to contribute to the Spark Connect Go client, I was
>> > > contemplating not requiring them to deal with two accounts (one for
>> Jira)
>> > > and one for Gihutb but allow using GitHub Issues for bugs and issues
>> that
>> > > are specific to *only* the Spark Connect Go client.
>> > >
>> > > Jira will still be used for issues that span core Spark. This allows
>> us to
>> > > easily label issues for starter tasks in one place, for example.
>> > >
>> > > I am explicitly not proposing to change the behavior for the main
>> Spark
>> > > repository; here, the existing procedure remains.
>> > >
>> > > What do you think?
>> > >
>> > > Martin
>> > >
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
>>
>>

Reply via email to