Hi Ruifeng, We have already ported those scripts
Ruifeng Zheng <ruife...@apache.org> 于2024年8月9日周五 12:41写道： > Hi Kent, I remember that we have some scripts to free disk in spark repo, > maybe we can reuse them for spark-website. > > On Fri, Aug 9, 2024 at 9:57 AM Sean Owen <sro...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I don't think that's the issue - it's the size of what is cloned into a >> container during the GitHub actions runs. Doesnt matter how it is stored. >> >> They are not large files, either. >> >> On Thu, Aug 8, 2024, 4:34 PM Mich Talebzadeh <mich.talebza...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Maybe you should look into deploying GitHub Large File Storage >>> <https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/working-with-files/managing-large-files/configuring-git-large-file-storage> >>> (LFS). If applicable, store large documentation files in LFS to reduce the >>> repository size. >>> >>> HTH >>> >>> Mich Talebzadeh, >>> >>> Architect | Data Engineer | Data Science | Financial Crime >>> PhD <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctor_of_Philosophy> Imperial >>> College London <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperial_College_London> >>> London, United Kingdom >>> >>> >>> view my Linkedin profile >>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/mich-talebzadeh-ph-d-5205b2/> >>> >>> >>> https://en.everybodywiki.com/Mich_Talebzadeh >>> >>> >>> >>> *Disclaimer:* The information provided is correct to the best of my >>> knowledge but of course cannot be guaranteed . It is essential to note >>> that, as with any advice, quote "one test result is worth one-thousand >>> expert opinions (Werner >>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wernher_von_Braun>Von Braun >>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wernher_von_Braun>)". >>> >>> >>> On Thu, 8 Aug 2024 at 22:02, Sean Owen <sro...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> That seems a liiiitle bit too much to me. I could see people still on a >>>> recent version that just want to see docs or compare/contrast docs for >>>> changes. >>>> Removing the versions that seem to have ~0 traffic would remove, it >>>> seems, like 80% of the .html files (and replace them with a compressed >>>> archive that's smaller), which seems 'enough' for the moment? >>>> >>>> But if docs releases are 1GB going forward, this will be an issue again >>>> soon. >>>> >>>> On Thu, Aug 8, 2024 at 1:25 PM Wenchen Fan <cloud0...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> It makes sense to me to only keep the doc files for the latest >>>>> maintenance release. i.e. remove the docs for 3.5.0 and only keep 3.5.1. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>
