Sure, no problem.

Holden Karau <hol...@pigscanfly.ca> 于2023年9月2日周六 22:10写道:

> Can we delay the next RC cut until after Labor Day?
>
> On Sat, Sep 2, 2023 at 9:59 PM Yuanjian Li <xyliyuanj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thank you for all the reports!
>> The vote has failed. I plan to cut RC4 in two days.
>>
>> @Dipayan Dev <dev.dipaya...@gmail.com> I quickly skimmed through the
>> corresponding ticket, and it doesn't seem to be a regression introduced in
>> 3.5. Additionally, someone is asking if this is the same issue as
>> SPARK-35279.
>> @Yuming Wang <yumw...@apache.org> I will check the signature for RC4
>> @Jungtaek Lim <kabhwan.opensou...@gmail.com> I will follow-up with you
>> regarding SPARK-45045 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-45045>
>> @Wenchen Fan <cloud0...@gmail.com> Agree, we should include the
>> correctness fix in 3.5
>>
>> Jungtaek Lim <kabhwan.opensou...@gmail.com> 于2023年8月31日周四 23:45写道:
>>
>>> My apologies, I have to add another ticket for a blocker, SPARK-45045
>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-45045>. That said, I'm -1
>>> (non-binding).
>>>
>>> SPARK-43183 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-43183> made a
>>> behavioral change regarding the StreamingQueryListener as well as
>>> StreamingQuery API as a side-effect, while the intention was more about
>>> introducing the change in the former one. I just got some reports that the
>>> behavioral change for StreamingQuery API broke various tests in 3rd party
>>> data sources. To help 3rd party ecosystems to adopt 3.5 without hassle, I'd
>>> like to see this be fixed in 3.5.0.
>>>
>>> There is no fix yet but I'm working on it. I'll give an update here.
>>> Maybe we could lower down priority and let the release go with describing
>>> this as a "known issue", if I couldn't make progress in a couple of days.
>>> I'm sorry about that.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jungtaek Lim
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 1, 2023 at 12:12 PM Wenchen Fan <cloud0...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sorry for the last-minute bug report, but we found a regression in 3.5:
>>>> the SQL INSERT command without a column list fills missing columns with
>>>> NULL while Spark 3.4 does not allow it. According to the SQL standard, this
>>>> shouldn't be allowed and thus a regression in 3.5.
>>>>
>>>> The fix has been merged but one day after the RC3 cut:
>>>> https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/42393 . I'm -1 and let's include
>>>> this fix in 3.5.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Wenchen
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 9:09 PM Ian Manning <ian.a.mann...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>
>>>>> Using Spark Core, Spark SQL, Structured Streaming.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 8:12 PM Yuanjian Li <xyliyuanj...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate(RC3) as Apache Spark
>>>>>> version 3.5.0.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The vote is open until 11:59pm Pacific time Aug 31st and passes if a
>>>>>> majority +1 PMC votes are cast, with a minimum of 3 +1 votes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 3.5.0
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To learn more about Apache Spark, please see http://spark.apache.org/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The tag to be voted on is v3.5.0-rc3 (commit
>>>>>> 9f137aa4dc43398aafa0c3e035ed3174182d7d6c):
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/spark/tree/v3.5.0-rc3
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found
>>>>>> at:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/v3.5.0-rc3-bin/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signatures used for Spark RCs can be found in this file:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/KEYS
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The staging repository for this release can be found at:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachespark-1447
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The documentation corresponding to this release can be found at:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/v3.5.0-rc3-docs/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The list of bug fixes going into 3.5.0 can be found at the following
>>>>>> URL:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SPARK/versions/12352848
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This release is using the release script of the tag v3.5.0-rc3.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> FAQ
>>>>>>
>>>>>> =========================
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How can I help test this release?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> =========================
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you are a Spark user, you can help us test this release by taking
>>>>>>
>>>>>> an existing Spark workload and running on this release candidate, then
>>>>>>
>>>>>> reporting any regressions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you're working in PySpark you can set up a virtual env and install
>>>>>>
>>>>>> the current RC and see if anything important breaks, in the Java/Scala
>>>>>>
>>>>>> you can add the staging repository to your projects resolvers and test
>>>>>>
>>>>>> with the RC (make sure to clean up the artifact cache before/after so
>>>>>>
>>>>>> you don't end up building with an out of date RC going forward).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ===========================================
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What should happen to JIRA tickets still targeting 3.5.0?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ===========================================
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The current list of open tickets targeted at 3.5.0 can be found at:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SPARK and search for "Target
>>>>>> Version/s" = 3.5.0
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Committers should look at those and triage. Extremely important bug
>>>>>>
>>>>>> fixes, documentation, and API tweaks that impact compatibility should
>>>>>>
>>>>>> be worked on immediately. Everything else please retarget to an
>>>>>>
>>>>>> appropriate release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ==================
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But my bug isn't fixed?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ==================
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In order to make timely releases, we will typically not hold the
>>>>>>
>>>>>> release unless the bug in question is a regression from the previous
>>>>>>
>>>>>> release. That being said, if there is something which is a regression
>>>>>>
>>>>>> that has not been correctly targeted please ping me or a committer to
>>>>>>
>>>>>> help target the issue.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yuanjian Li
>>>>>>
>>>>>

Reply via email to