Agree, just, if it's such a tiny change, and it actually fixes the issue, maybe worth getting that into 3.3.x. I don't feel strongly.
On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 11:19 AM L. C. Hsieh <vii...@gmail.com> wrote: > If it is not supported in Spark 3.3.x, it looks like an improvement at > Spark 3.4. > For such cases we usually do not back port. I think this is also why > the PR did not back port when it was merged. > > I'm okay if there is consensus to back port it. > >
